June 29, 2013

Rainier Arms Raptor Charging Handle - Gear Review

Rainier Arms Raptor Charging Handle - Gear Review

The Rainier Arms Raptor Charging Handle is probably one of my favorite modifications to my personal AR15 to date. I often had trouble using the the cheap stock charging handle while operating with shooting gloves, and although I am not left handed, this ambidextrous charging handle makes operation from different angles and using different fingers an absolute ease. The price point is a little steep compared to some other products out there, at around $80 it definitely is one of the more expensive options out there, however, I would recommend taking the plunge on this item 100% as it instantly improves your ability to manipulate your rifles bolt carrier group which can decrease your time making your rifle ready to fire, as well as reducing time spent clearing malfunctions. 

It is very sturdy and seems like it could withstand a beating. I love the look of the latch, since its the same on both sides, making it fully ambidextrous. In fact, if you play Call of Duty - Black Ops 2, this same charging handle seems to be on one of the Assault Rifles, the M27. This is the perfect size in my opinion. It's not too big, but not too small either.

5/5 - Definite Buy



Gun Manufacture's Act of Defiance Ahead of Magazine Ban in Colorado

Gun Manufacture's Act of Defiance Ahead of Magazine Ban in Colorado

It will be illegal to purchase, manufacture or sell magazines that hold more than 15 rounds of ammunition in the state of Colorado come Monday. Recently-passed gun control measures have Second Amendment supporters angry while several gun manufacturers are fleeing the state.
One of the companies getting out of Colorado is Magpul Industries — but not before one final, symbolic act of defiance.
Magpul Plans to Give Away 1,500 30 Round Magazines Ahead of New Colorado Magazine Ban
Magpul plans to give away 1,500 30-round ammunition magazines in Colorado on Saturday, just a couple days before the ban goes into effect. The magazines will be given away at a “Freedom Festival” on a first-come first-served basis. The event will be held at Infinity Park in Glendale, Colo., from 4-8 p.m., Magpul announced on its official Facebook page.
A number of gun control measures will go into effect July 1, including the magazine ban and expansive universal background checks. However, the law is not retroactive and allows gun owners to keep soon-to-be illegal high-capacity magazines if they were purchased legally before July 1.
In other words, every gun owner who gets a free 30-round magazine from Magpul is covered.
Magpul Plans to Give Away 1,500 30 Round Magazines Ahead of New Colorado Magazine Ban
Credit: Getty Images
“Just to clarify, it seems many of the local news outlets are billing us as an ‘ammunition’ company, and saying that we will be giving out free ammo. This is incorrect…as you all know, we build magazines and accessories, and it is empty, 20 and 30 round magazines that will be for sale and also given away for the first 1500,” Magpul said in a statement.
Magpul, which claims it contributes roughly $85 million to Colorado’s economy and employs 200 people, is leaving Colorado over the new gun control measured signed into law by Gov. John Hickenlooper in response to the Sandy Hook shooting.
The company reaffirmed its plan to leave Colorado on its Facebook page on Thursday, though Magpul hasn’t announced where it plans to relocate.

Political Humor

does this make you a hacker a slasher an arsonist inanimate objects dont cause crime Does This Make you a Hacker, a Slasher, an Arsonist? Inanimate Objects dont Cause Crime.

N.C. Bill May Allow Guns on Campuses

N.C. bill may allow guns on campuses

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/06/28/4135081/nc-bill-may-allow-guns-on-campuses.html#storylink=cpy


A measure in House Bill 937 could allow concealed weapon permit holders to store firearms in locked compartments of their vehicles on college campuses and schools.
Leaders at Rowan-Cabarrus Community College oppose the bill. They say it has more potential to cause harm than to make campuses safer.
The bill passed the N.C. House 78-42 in May and, after being amended, passed the N.C. Senate 31-16 in June. The bill now has to go back to the House, where members will decide how to respond to the Senate’s changes. If the House ratifies the changes, the bill then goes to the governor to sign it into law.
Scott Ralls, head of the N.C. Community College System, said the safety of students, faculty and staff is a top priority.
“Therefore, changing our campuses from allowing no firearms to allowing even limited firearms presents concerns,” he said. “Our preference is that our community colleges not be included in this legislation.”
Carol Spalding, president of Rowan-Cabarrus, said the campus has a long record of being a safe campus and workplace.
“We continuously evaluate our policies and procedures to provide for the safety of our students, faculty and staff in accordance with current law,” she said. “We do hope that legislators will consider amendments to the currently proposed legislation that would require that weapons be stored in a concealed compartment from public view, limit the amount of ammunition and the number of weapons that can be carried, and reinforce the current state law that makes it a felony to possess firearms on a campus.”
Student Government Association President Leslie Brown considers RCCC a very safe place and said loaded, concealed guns don’t belong on college campuses.
Local representatives Carl Ford, Linda Johnson and Larry Pittman each voted for the bill, but only Pittman could be reached for comment via email. Pittman, who represents residents of Cabarrus County’s N.C. House District 82, said he supported the bill because it was improved by the Senate.
“It was originally a rather mediocre bill and still does not go as far as I would like, but it is a much stronger bill than it was originally,” he said. “… It moves us closer to the demand of our founding fathers that ‘the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.’ ”
Pittman said similar bills he drafted would have allowed college students, faculty and staff members with concealed weapons permits to carry firearms throughout campuses.
“Such a policy could have prevented, or at least reduced, the death toll in the massacre at Virginia Tech,” Pittman said. “Unfortunately, this bill will not allow them that level of self-defense, but at least they might have some chance of getting to the gun in their car and putting a stop to any event similar to the Virginia Tech massacre.
“Criminals don’t obey gun laws, anyway, so we should set our law-abiding citizens free of government interference. …”
Good guys vs. bad guys
Tim Bost, director of public safety and security at RCCC, retired in 2009 from a 34-year law enforcement career with the Rowan County Sheriff’s Office.
His preference would be to maintain the current state law, which makes it a felony to possess a firearm on a college or school campus. If the proposed bill becomes law, Bost said, he hopes the language dictates that firearms can’t be visible.
“If not, you can imagine the chaos that would cause on any college campus or school if someone walked by a parked car and saw a weapon in plain view,” he said. “But the ultimate question for campus security, or responding law enforcement officers, is ‘When the guns come out, will officers know who the good guys are and who the bad guys are?’ ”
No matter how well-intended concealed weapons permit holders are, Bost said, students and staff should never intervene in an active shooter situation, as it puts law enforcement and themselves at risk.
“Officers will likely hesitate, knowing other people may be there with weapons – and they’re not going to know who the shooter is,” Bost said. “Do not attempt to go to your car and try to retrieve a weapon. And certainly do not return to a college building with a weapon, because then you place yourself in great jeopardy from responding officers.”
A gray area
Bost, an avid supporter of gun rights, has no problem with the state’s current concealed carry law.
“I’m actually one of those who believes people have the fundamental right to carry a means to protect themselves,” he said. “I don’t have a problem with people carrying concealed weapons. I just think the school setting is a sacred place.
“Even under the … environment that we have experienced recently, with active shooters on college campuses, the campus should be free of firearms. If gun owners’ intentions will be to grab their firearm and go back to the classroom, we’ll have a real problem.”
If the General Assembly wants to enhance security at schools and college campuses, he said, they should provide funding for electronic surveillance and campus access, more emergency response equipment, communication infrastructure and more security officers.
RCCC serves 22,000 students annually. Its south campus off N.C. 73 in Concord serves roughly half that total. Larceny and theft – the majority involving vehicle break-ins – made up roughly 42 percent of crimes in 2012 on RCCC’s Cabarrus County campuses. Harassment and stalking, hit-and-run with a motor vehicle, vandalism, simple assault and disorderly conduct were the next most frequent crimes.
Bost said potential thieves, who could overhear talk of a gun in a car, also could be more likely to break into cars if the bill becomes law.
“People who own firearms are very proud of their weapons – and I’m one of them – and they like to show them off,” he said. “It’s inevitable that’s going to occur in a college parking lot, and when that occurs and someone sees that, it’s going to trigger a 911 response.
“You’re going to roll basically everything you have into an emergency response. You’re going to lock a college down. You’re going to cancel classes. And you have to ask yourself, ‘Is it really worth all that to allow someone to carry a weapon on campus, locked in their car?’ ”





Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/06/28/4135081/nc-bill-may-allow-guns-on-campuses.html#storylink=cpy

June 28, 2013

Condor Rip-Away EMT Pouch MA41 - Gear Review

Condor Rip-Away EMT pouch MA41 - Gear Review

The Condor Rip-Away EMT Pouch is one of the newest additions to my active shooter or rifle patrol vest (which is separate to my daily outer patrol vest) The pouch s great, high quality construction from Condor and ample space for all the EMT supplies you could possibly need on a vest of this type, it truly shows that you don't need to spend a fortune to get quality equipment...Please watch the video provided below for the full review. 




AR500 Rifle Rated Ballistic Body Armor - Gear Review

AR500 Rifle Rated Ballistic Body Armor - Gear Review

My Review



Plates Live Fire Test



63 rounds of 5.56 green tip



This is what I need....

GWA Mk2 Morale Patch

June 27, 2013

Condor T&T Admin Pouch - Gear Review



Condor T&T Admin Pouch - Gear Review


The Condor T&T Admin Pouch was purchased at the extremely reasonable price of $20 delivered. I REALLY wanted to use this as the admin pouch on my active shooter patrol vest, however, the MOLLE attachment pouch is deceivingly small in its pictures and there is no way to smartly mount it on my vest without completely blocking something far more essential, my AR15 Magazines. The pouch is covered in depth in the video review, however, the specs from the manufacture website states the following; 

- Fully opens with paracord to adjust
- Internal Sleeve, Zipper Pocket, and Elastic Webbing
- External Webbing with Velcro Attachment


I would recommend this pouch with use on a MOLLE compatible backpack, or as a stand alone pouch with the possibility of using it as a pistol rug. Anyway, enjoy the pictures and video and feel free to ask any further questions. 



 ^ Blocks the safe retrieving of AR Magazines ^



This is the Red Rock Outdoor Gear Admin Pouch that will replace it...




June 26, 2013

Tactical 5.11 Versatility Patrol Ready Bag - Gear Review (Pics & Video)

Tactical 5.11 Versatility Patrol Ready Bag - Gear Review (PICS & VIDEO)

This is another review of my 5.11 Patrol Bag, this is a great versatile patrol bag which comes at extremely competitive price, especially for something 5.11 branded. I picked up the bag from Amazon for approximately $50 delivered which again, is highly competitive for a top line brand. The bag is 600 denier nylon which is also water resistant (although never personally tested.) I've been using this bag daily for approximately 6 months, it features; outer water bottle holders, admin pouch (inner and outer) baton holder, padded back for weapon protection, and many more features that will be covered in the video review.

The 5.11 Patrol Bag is also the perfect size for most passenger seats and one can use the shoulder strap to secure the bag to the passenger seat. The contents of this bag are used purely for work patrol purposes, so I carry no extra ammo or tactical equipment in it, all of that is featured on my patrol vest and active shooter vest.

The main drawback of this bag, in my opinion, is the lack of specific pouches for a flashlight and collapsible baton which can be found on Hatch Patrol Bag. This makes holding sensitive items such as this more secure and easy to locate rather then digging around the main section of the bag trying to locate items such as this.



5.11 Patrol Bag Review - Citizen Gunner



Black Ops


June 25, 2013

Police Officers and Active Shooters

april 2009 008 300x225 Police officers should add a traffic vest to their go bag for active shooters
Can your traffic vest be more important than your bulletproof vest during an active shooter?
During an active shooter training scenario (See end of article for the scenario) one point became pretty clear. Cops are probably going to shoot cops. During our realistic scenario almost everyone shot another uniformed officer.
The fact is cops are ramped up and speed to shoot instinctively becomes the most important issue for them. To increase speed, shortcuts are made by officers and one is obviously target identification.
Part of the problem comes from the traditional methods of training. We drill officers to watch the hands and then identify bad guys during scenarios by putting weapons in their hands. We have neglected to teach looking at the whole person first. This causes friendly fire incidents when speed is paramount and all the good guys have weapons in their hands too.

Beliefs vs. Reality

During training we take for granted that we will identify the other police officers because:
Belief: They are wearing uniforms
Reality: In practice uniforms didn’t do much. They are a plain color without immediately apparent police identification on the back or sides. The front isn’t much better. The shiny badge and buttons are small details and are not immediate apparent in your peripheral vision or upon a quick glance. The polo shirt or BDU shirt uniforms were more effective during scenarios because they had “POLICE” in big type on the front and back.
Belief: Other officers are our friends; we know what they look like.
Reality: During active shooters every cop in town drops what they are doing and rushes to the scene. That will include detectives, undercovers, off-duty officers, and officers from other agencies.
If the active shooter happens in a school or mall there will also be SROs or security officers involved. When is the last time you did anything with the local SRO? Most young patrol officers don’t recognize any of them.
Belief: We are moving as a group and not getting separated.
Reality: Cops will be entering the building from different locations and at different times. There will be multiple officers separately searching for the shooter.
Belief: Officers will coordinate their locations, efforts, and intentions by radio, yelling to each other, and using hand signals.
Reality: With fire alarms going off, the physiological effect of auditory exclusion, gunfire, etc. the ability to communicate will be severely hampered. Radio communications can be questionable because there is too much information pouring into a single channel.
The fog of war will be in full effect during this incident so we need to plan for it.

Solution: Use a traffic vest

A simple solution for these problems appears to be wearing your traffic vest when you go in. It is instantly recognizable from all angles.
Additionally, many officers have already done training repetitions not shooting officers wearing traffic vests during Force on Force training because the instructors wear them to identify themselves as off limits. Whether officers realized it or not they were getting training repetitions of not shooting people wearing traffic vests. (See article by Betsy Brantner Smith about this topic.)
The obvious disadvantage for wearing a traffic vest is that officers are more identifiable for the suspect. But the suspect is shooting everything that moves anyway. Looking like a walking traffic cone may actually surprise him and give an officer the half second he or she needs to get shots on target before the suspect reacts.
Update: A new product called DSM safety banners is another solution to this issue. Check out Frank Borelli’s review of them or go to DSM’s website. (Hat tip to Bill Lewis of Tactical Debriefs)

Final Thoughts

I think in the initial phase of an active shooter, the benefits of wearing the traffic vest outweigh the negatives. When things stabilize because the shooter has stopped, is contained, and officers on scene have begun coordinating their efforts effectively you can lose the vest. But in the beginning, it appears as important as your bulletproof vest so wear them both.

June 24, 2013

World War Z - MOVIE REVIEW

World War Z - MOVIE REVIEW

Those of you looking to fulfill your wildest Zombie Apocalypse fantasy and get a semi at the movie theater, look further. While World War Z was a highly anticipated apocalypse style movie, I believe it fell short of the mark in that sense. Before you write it off, let me elaborate. World War Z is a very well put together movie, however, I would class it as more of a "sci-fi" style movie then an action or thriller, as the majority of the movie follows Brad Pitt, who we never actually find out what his job is, but plays the world saving scientist geek who also has near perfect shooting and plane crash survival skills.

Either way, of course the movie has a happy ending, I was simply disappointed about the lack of "zombie apocalypse survival" coverage, especially the way doomsday preppers have evolved in current times. I will post videos to World War Z & Doomsday Preppers below...

The Verdict: See it at a matinee or wait for redbox...

6/10 



June 22, 2013

Insurance Company Pulls Coverage to Schools with Armed Teachers


Already, President Obama has made curbing gun rights a legislative priority, and his administration has limited the rights of certain veterans, people with various medical diagnoses and users of marijuana in states where possession is legal.

In yet another challenge to the Second Amendment, an insurance company has refused to provide its products to schools that want to protect students by arming teachers or staff members.
Now, the EMC Insurance Cos., which insures many Kansas schools, has announced it will not cover any school in which certain defensive measures are taken to protect students, such as teachers carrying concealed weapons.
“We understand that the school districts have every right to decide which way they want to go,” a company vice president in Wichita told the Topeka Capital-Journal.
“But we have to make the decision based on what we perceive to be our best financial interest.”
A new state law allows teachers and other workers to carry guns on school grounds under some circumstances. Previously, only police officers were allowed to be armed.
It all comes in the wake of the Sandy Hook school shooting last fall in which a troubled gunman shot and killed 20 children. The tragedy has been used by the Obama administration to push for more gun bans, while Second Amendment advocates point out that nothing has changed. Schools where guns are banned become instant killing zones when a deranged person attacks, they argue.
EMC, which insures about 90 percent of the state’s 286 school districts, has issued a letter to its agents explaining that teachers carrying concealed weapons won’t be allowed by the company.
The letter is available on the Capital-Journal’s website.


Ar-15 Barbie


June 21, 2013

Zombie Gear


NEW PRODUCT - ITS Limited Edition Uncle Sam Morale Patch

Very cool morale patch released by ITS Tactical Supply, a combination of their logo mixed with the Uncle Sam Icon we all know and features hook and loop backing. Free America.....


DSC00029

ITS Tactical Purchase Page

Body Armor Protection Levels Explained

Certification of Body Armor

The National Institute of Justice has a rating system for body armor.  As you add layers of a ballistic fiber, such as Aramid fiber, you add protection.
Vests are tested not just for stopping penetration, but also for blunt trauma protection – the blow suffered by the body from the bullet's impact on the vest. Blunt trauma is measured by the dent suffered by a soft clay backstop to the vest – a maximum of 1.7" (44 mm) is allowed.
NOTE: The standard NIJ test rounds are listed below – tested vests stop many other comparable rounds, and lesser threats.
NIJ 0101.05 Standard
Level
Tested for:
Comment
II-A

9 mm FMJ (Full Metal Jacket) at ~1,090 fps
(332 mps)



.40 S&W
 Full Metal Jacket at 1,025 fps
(312 mps)
Minimum Recommended...
...for the vast majority of threats encountered on the street, though you would sustain more blunt trauma injury than Level II or III-A. The thinnest and best for concealability and comfort.
Level II-A has fallen out of favor, so generally a special order item now.
II

9 mm FMJ, at ~1,175 fps
(~358 mps)



.357 JSP at ~ 1,400 fps
(~427 mps).
A great balance...
...between blunt trauma protection, versus cost, and thickness / comfort / concealability. Handles the blunt trauma of higher velocity +P rounds better.
What we recommend most often for concealable wear.
III-A

9 mm FMJ at ~1,400 fps
(~427 mps)



.44 Magnum Semi-Jacketed Hollow Point at ~1,400 fps
(~427 mps).
The highest blunt trauma protectionrating in soft body armor. The best for very high-risk situations to cover more of the uncommon or unusual threats.
Minimizes blunt trauma injury to allow more effective return fire.
It is important to know that Level II-A, II and III-A all stop the overwhelming majority of pistol projectiles you are ever likely to encounter (plus 12 gauge, OO buckshot), and also to know that NO armor is ever 100% ‘bulletproof’ under ALL conceivable circumstances.
However, these ratings often have a safety margin for penetration because blunt trauma is usually the limiting factor in certification. For example, Level II body armor would likely stop the III-A test standard, (9 mm submachine gun at 1400 fps) from actually PENETRATING through the Level II vest. But, the Level II vest would fail on blunt trauma impact (the NIJ deems any dent greater than ~1.7" (~44 mm.) on the soft clay test surface, a FAIL).
So, the advantage in increasing protection Levels from II-A, to II, to III-A, is NOT so much protection from PENETRATION of pistol fire, but a significant reduction in the blunt trauma received.